back to top
HomeSecurityUPDF Speaks About Court Martial Injustice Controversy In Col Besigye's Trial

UPDF Speaks About Court Martial Injustice Controversy In Col Besigye’s Trial

Published on

- Advertisement -spot_img

The Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) has dismissed allegations of injustice in its court martial system, stating that such accusations are deliberate attempts to discredit military courts and shield offenders from accountability.

Brigadier General Felix Kulayigye, the Director of Defence Public Relations, issued a strong rebuttal on Monday, December 16, 2024, labeling the criticism as “systematic and unfounded attacks” aimed at undermining the credibility of the military judiciary. His response was triggered by an article in the Daily Monitor titled Glaring Difference Between Army and Civilian Courts, which questioned the operations of military tribunals.

Brig Gen Kulayigye pointed to the arrest of political figure Dr. Kizza Besigye and his bodyguard Hajji Obeid Lutale on November 20, 2024, as the source of the recent backlash. The pair was charged with illegal possession of firearms and ammunition, prompting critics to label military courts as “kangaroo courts” and question their authority to try civilians.

One of the vocal critics, lawyer Eron Kiiza, alleged that military tribunals in Uganda are illegitimate and operate outside the bounds of the law. Brig Gen Kulayigye refuted these claims, emphasizing that the Supreme Court has established military courts as legitimate components of Uganda’s judicial system, subordinate to the High Court.

“The UPDF Court Martial is guided by structured judicial processes and includes trained legal professionals, such as judge advocates, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and registrars, all of whom are accredited advocates of the High Court of Uganda,” Brig Gen Kulayigye explained.

He further argued that claims of unfairness and lack of adherence to the adversarial system are unfounded, asserting that military courts follow procedures comparable to civilian courts.

The UPDF is currently awaiting a Supreme Court ruling in the landmark case Attorney General vs. Kabaziguruka, which will further clarify the role of military courts in trying civilians.

As public debate intensifies, Brig Gen Kulayigye called for an end to what he termed “misleading narratives” about the military justice system. He urged all stakeholders to respect legal principles and rely on accurate interpretations of the law rather than promoting falsehoods.

The UPDF reiterated its commitment to the rule of law and maintaining the integrity of its judicial processes while ensuring that all cases are handled fairly and transparently.

Related

How eKitabu’s Exclusive Reception Expanded the Horizons of Kampala Writes LitFest 2026

For three days, the Kampala Writes LitFest 2026 gave readers and writers a place to meet,...

Wonderful: Next Media Stations Rank Among Uganda’s Television Leaders As Sanyuka Tv Surges To No. 2

Next Media’s television brands continue to strengthen their position in Uganda’s highly competitive television...

Fameica, Tojjo And Truth 256 Headline Club Canvas Experience in Mbarara

A different kind of Saturday is taking shape along the Kampala–Mbarara route. On September...

EABC Director Kamukama Sounds Alarm Over Low EAC Trade, Calls for African Export Revolution

KAMPALA — The East African Business Council Director representing Uganda, Mr Oscar Kamukama, has...

More from The Capital Times

Africa Can Feed Itself-Museveni Declares End To Food Imports With Homegrown Solutions

President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni has reiterated the importance of food self-sufficiency in Africa, stressing...

Business Boom In Namugongo Ahead Of Martyrs Day

Business has picked up this morning at Namugongo Martyrs shrine according to traders. The...

Here is why the Faras Uganda is the Ultimate Convenience Mobility App for Every Ugandan

Kampala, Uganda – In a fast-paced world where time is increasingly precious, Ugandans are...