back to top
HomeSecurityUPDF Speaks About Court Martial Injustice Controversy In Col Besigye's Trial

UPDF Speaks About Court Martial Injustice Controversy In Col Besigye’s Trial

Published on

- Advertisement -spot_img

The Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) has dismissed allegations of injustice in its court martial system, stating that such accusations are deliberate attempts to discredit military courts and shield offenders from accountability.

Brigadier General Felix Kulayigye, the Director of Defence Public Relations, issued a strong rebuttal on Monday, December 16, 2024, labeling the criticism as “systematic and unfounded attacks” aimed at undermining the credibility of the military judiciary. His response was triggered by an article in the Daily Monitor titled Glaring Difference Between Army and Civilian Courts, which questioned the operations of military tribunals.

Brig Gen Kulayigye pointed to the arrest of political figure Dr. Kizza Besigye and his bodyguard Hajji Obeid Lutale on November 20, 2024, as the source of the recent backlash. The pair was charged with illegal possession of firearms and ammunition, prompting critics to label military courts as “kangaroo courts” and question their authority to try civilians.

One of the vocal critics, lawyer Eron Kiiza, alleged that military tribunals in Uganda are illegitimate and operate outside the bounds of the law. Brig Gen Kulayigye refuted these claims, emphasizing that the Supreme Court has established military courts as legitimate components of Uganda’s judicial system, subordinate to the High Court.

“The UPDF Court Martial is guided by structured judicial processes and includes trained legal professionals, such as judge advocates, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and registrars, all of whom are accredited advocates of the High Court of Uganda,” Brig Gen Kulayigye explained.

He further argued that claims of unfairness and lack of adherence to the adversarial system are unfounded, asserting that military courts follow procedures comparable to civilian courts.

The UPDF is currently awaiting a Supreme Court ruling in the landmark case Attorney General vs. Kabaziguruka, which will further clarify the role of military courts in trying civilians.

As public debate intensifies, Brig Gen Kulayigye called for an end to what he termed “misleading narratives” about the military justice system. He urged all stakeholders to respect legal principles and rely on accurate interpretations of the law rather than promoting falsehoods.

The UPDF reiterated its commitment to the rule of law and maintaining the integrity of its judicial processes while ensuring that all cases are handled fairly and transparently.

Related

Mukono Residents Demand Accountability From Hon. Nsibwa Fred Kagwa Over Theatre Construction Funds At Nakifuma Health Centre III

Mukono residents are demanding accountability from Hon. Nsibwa Fred Kagwa, the Member of Parliament...

Shincheonji Taekwondo Team Wins Medals Again At International Competition, Shining On The Global Stage

At the 2025 Park Chung-hee Cup International Open Taekwondo Championships: 4 Gold, 7 Silver,...

Bebe Cool Reflects On Key Lessons From His Kenya and Dar es Salaam Media Tour

After two weeks in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, promoting his Break the Chains...

Kadaga Dumps Namuganza As Allies Suffer Defeat In NRM Primaries

Veteran politician and First Deputy Prime Minister, Rt Hon. Rebecca Kadaga, appears to have...

More from The Capital Times

Business Boom In Namugongo Ahead Of Martyrs Day

Business has picked up this morning at Namugongo Martyrs shrine according to traders. The...

Minister Kasolo In Hot Soup Over Alleged Orungo Voter Attacks Accused Of Orchestrating Violence Fo Intimidate Opponents in NRM Primaries

A political storm is brewing in Orungo sub-county after shocking allegations emerged linking Uganda’s...

African contemporary singer Liboi pairs up with Kenyan producer Kayrop on new single “twende sote”

NAIROBI - JULY 11, 2025 — African contemporary singer Liboi has teamed up withKenyan...