back to top
HomeBusinessWhy Sudhir's Lawyers Want Crane Bank Returned To It's Original Share Holders

Why Sudhir’s Lawyers Want Crane Bank Returned To It’s Original Share Holders

Published on

- Advertisement -spot_img

In January 2017, Crane Bank was acquired by DFCU Bank at a cost of Shs200 billion ($52.8 million) on grounds that it was undercapitalized as declared by the regulator Bank of Uganda.

Crane Bank whose proprietor is businessman Sudhir Reparelia remained open under statutory management until most of its assets and liabilities would be transferred through a P&A to a suitable acquiring bank, DFCU, thereby avoiding disruption to its customers.

However, since its closure, Sudhir, his Meera Investments Ltd and Bank of Uganda have been in a long legal battle over the defunct bank.

In September this year, Bank of Uganda decided to withdraw a Supreme Court appeal that was contesting the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of the case it filed on behalf of Crane Bank Ltd (in Receivership) vs. Sudhir Ruparelia and Meera Investments Ltd.

In a September 15 notice of withdrawal, the Supreme Court Registrar indicated that BoU had decided not to prosecute the appeal and would pay costs.

Last year, Bank of Uganda ran to the Supreme Court to appeal the Court of Appeal ruling, which upheld an earlier High decision to dismiss a case that had been filed against businessman Sudhir by Crane Bank in receivership.

Prior, the Court of Appeal in Kampala threw out a case against Dr Sudhir.

Meanwhile, lawyers representing Sudhir have asked the court to compel Bank of Uganda to give back the assets of Crane Bank Limited to its original shareholders since its receivership ended in 2018.

The lawyers; Peter Kabatsi, Joseph Matsiko and Elison Karuhanga demand that BoU must not only return the bank to its shareholders but must also pay the costs Mr. Sudhir incurred throughout the long court battle with the central bank.

“The appellant receivership ended on January 2018 and BoU is to pay costs therein and in the court,” reads one of the documents from the court.

Lawyers say that since receivership ended, BoU does not have any options but to return the assets and pay the costs of the suits.

Related

A Global Gateway To Chinese Culture

By Yuan Zhong From the perspective of cultural communication, the Hello Chinese program has broken...

Big Size Recap: London Parties With Legendary Bebe Cool’s Break The Chains Album Was Massive

On August 12th, Bebe Cool held a successful listener’s party at Masq London, Restaurant...

City Businessman Hamis Kiggundu Launches Cleanup to Pave Way for Nakivubo Channel Redevelopment

Kampala, Uganda – City businessman Hamis Kiggundu, popularly known as Ham, has embarked on...

Nakivubo Channel Set for Major Redevelopment as Uganda Races Towards AFCON 2027

Kampala is moving to cover and modernize the infamous Nakivubo Channel, a drainage trench...

More from The Capital Times

Business Boom In Namugongo Ahead Of Martyrs Day

Business has picked up this morning at Namugongo Martyrs shrine according to traders. The...

Uganda Adopts Kiswahili As Official Language

Uganda has adopted Kiswahili as an official language, a top government official said on...

Minister Kasolo In Hot Soup Over Alleged Orungo Voter Attacks Accused Of Orchestrating Violence Fo Intimidate Opponents in NRM Primaries

A political storm is brewing in Orungo sub-county after shocking allegations emerged linking Uganda’s...